1. Couple of thoughts on this. If Frank McKenna was not planning to run for the leadership, why did he resign his post so quickly after the election/Martin's resignation? And I'm trying to figure out what it means that two front runners have already declined instead of declared. Does it mean that the good ship Liberal is in worse shape than most suspect. Did McKenna get a look at where things actually stand and say, uh no? What do John Manley and Frank McKenna know that we don't? And how soon until we find out?

    It will be interesting in the upcoming weeks and months to see who else declines to join the fray. If no big names (Belinda doesn't count) sign on,it tells us something very interesting indeed.
    0

    Add a comment

  2. 0

    Add a comment

  3. Ten years ago I was in university, doing a part-time degree in the UofW's distance-ed program. While doing an economics assignment I sent an e-mail (possibly even snail mail) looking for some information to Industry Canada, headed by Minister of Industry John Manley. A few weeks later I received a large envelope packed with relevant information. Subsequently, I received a follow up phone call to ensure the information sent was relevant. A short conversation ensued in which I declared pleasure with the package received, and mentioned another item that may be helpful. A week later another large envelope with the information I had mentioned arrived.

    It was, a good experience. I had dealt with a well run ministry that went to some trouble to help a student with a small need, I was impressed and have watched John Manley fairly closely since.

    Manley was a good Minister, whether it was Industry, Foreign Affairs or Finance, Manley did, in my opinion, a good job. He was a good Politician and a Good man. He was a strong voice for the right wing of the Liberal Party and his presence in the leadership race will be missed. He would have provided a strong voice for the right in the leadership race. Without him it's possible no credible right leaning candidate will appear, pulling the political landscape in this country further to the left.

    John Manley would have been a strong candidate for Liberal leader and the race is lessened with his absence.
    0

    Add a comment

  4. 0

    Add a comment

  5. So, you have been The Right Honourable for two days now, how is it going? Press treating you any better? Lets see now, on your first day some aide to the President said they where pleased for you and looked forward to working with you and I heard on the radio how it was true, you where all buddy buddy with the Shrub. Of course, had President Bush not phoned a Liberal Prime Minister within hours we'd be talking about the snub. He doesn't call you for two days and it proves your in cahoots with him. Then you take the kids to school with a million or two photographers in tow, and what happens? You decide not to embarrass them with a kiss in front of the world, you shake their hands and it proves your cold and Grinch-like. Of course, had you kissed them you would be a big meany who embarrassed the kids in front of the whole world, and a child abuser for giving them your chest cold and what kind of Dad are you anyway?

    You know Stephen, I wouldn't even try all this photo-op junk. You're not good at it, and the critics will hate you anyway. Don't believe me, ask Charles Adler about what can only be described as a despicable conversation. But despicable or not, these guys are not about to stop. They're just going to keep writing junk like this:

    The new Prime Minister of Canada is Stephen Harper. I can say, without fear of any reasonable contradiction, that Harper is the single worst human being to ever be Prime Minister of Canada.

    Of course, if you contradicted him, it wouldn't be 'reasonable', so there's no arguing with the guy. As the left always does, they frame the basis for the argument, tilt it totally in their favour, and then dismiss you when you step outside of their rules. But hey, your "the single worst human being to ever..." and I'd vote for Hitler, so who are we to argue?

    The question becomes, what to do? Well since the CBC, Dalton Mcguinty, David Miller and a cabal of detractors feel entitled to give you advice, so shall I. If you are smart you would print it out, take it to the P.A.M.S. Coffee outlet in Lincoln Center. Throw in a couple of bucks and you'll be good for a White Chocolate Mocha Latte, which is truly excellent on one of those cold Ottawa winter days.

    First, there are some ethics investigations to have. You cannot ignore these; too many people used the intellectually lazy excuse that all politicians are the same, so I might as well vote Liberal. If you ignore the needed investigations, you prove them right. Prove them wrong.

    That said, it is not your investigation. Start up the process then get out of the way. Remember Cretien going after Mulroney for 7 years. He got away with, you won't. You'll be accused of being like Hitler if you interfere. Cut the auditor General and the RCMP loose (and whomever else is required to do a complete and thorough investigation) and get out of the way. And no leaks, it'll look mean spirited and you can't afford to waste goodwill on cheap political shots.

    While we are the subject of the RCMP, de-politicize them. There is the impression amongst some of the citizenry that the RCMP didn't do their job in the past 10 years, and they didn't do so for political reasons. That's unacceptable. Like ethics the RCMP must not just do their job, they must be seen to be doing their job. Free them from the restraint of Prime Ministerial overview, then let them find out what really happened in the past decade.

    Next up is cities. The shut out in Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal makes it tempting to say "The hell with 'em." As much fun as that would be to watch, don't do it. Treat them as darlings. Be inclusive by including them. Talk to their mayors and help solve some of their problems. If you are magnanamous in places that didn't vote for you, you give them reason to trust you. That's what this mandate is about, trust. You have to prove yourself as a trustworthy statesman and politician. You have two choices, lose the scary tag or saddle your party with it forever. Don't buy the junk about the Liberals being near extinction, but if you don't convince voters your party isn't scary, the Conservatives will be nearer extinction than you realize.

    You have your 5 priorities, and I'm mostly there for you, but here's a couple of thoughts. The NDP will push for proportional representation. Don't go there. It will saddle this country with minority governments forever, and will give too much power to parties like, oh the NDP, who will forever use their 17% of the vote to maintain a hold over power. Proportional representation guarantees big, unwieldy government from now until Canada ceases to be. Don't do it.

    Do, however, change the Canada election's act on third party advocation. If Michael Moore isn't going to prosecuted two election in a row, even though he clearly broke this law, then scrap it. Start again, and never mind third parties. They are democratic voices speaking freely and as long as they aren't associated with a party, shouldn't fall under the jurisdiction of Elections Canada.

    OK that's it. Print this out, head to P.A.M.S., ask for Beth and tell her Brian sent you. This with the price of the coffee will get you that white chocolate mocha, and you'll see I was right. Then consider my other points.
    0

    Add a comment

  6. If Stephen Harper is so anti-public Medicare, the greatest threat to perfection in socialistic medicine, the great Satan who wants to drag us all down the path of private heath insurance and (shutter) AMERICANIZATION of our health care, how come he goes to emerg. in the middle of the night?

    I know private doctors are inherently evil &tc. but should the Prime Minister be going to an emergency room? Isn't it a bit like making him travel business class?
    0

    Add a comment


  7. Back in 1981 Robert Plant released his first post-Zeppelin recording, a version of Elvis' Little Sister with Dave Edmunds and Rockpile, recorded at the 1979 concert to benefit the people of Kampuchea. Now comes news that he is again collaborating on Little Sister, this time with Pearl Jam. From Reuters:

    NEW YORK (Billboard) - As Pearl Jam nears completion on its new studio album, the group has finalized the track list for its upcoming holiday single, sent annually to members of its Ten Club fan organization.

    This year's single will feature a live cover of the Elvis Presley-popularized "Little Sister" with Robert Plant, taped last October in Chicago, as well as demo of the new song "Gone," which was debuted that same month during a show in Atlantic City, N.J.

    Before the band gets busy with promotion and touring, guitarist Mike McCready will stage a March 18 benefit for the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation at Seattle's Showbox. McCready will play with his UFO tribute band, Flight To Mars, on a bill that also features the Supersuckers and Lee Rude and the Trainwrecks.

    Reuters/Billboard

    0

    Add a comment

  8. 0

    Add a comment

  9. Canadians voted for change!

    On Monday, millions of Canadians confirmed it: good things happen when you vote NDP. From coast to coast to coast, millions voted NDP for change that puts working Canadians at the front of the line. And they elected an exceptional team of 29 NDP MPs who will fight for them.

    Monday was a good day for:

    • seniors who want more dignity.
    • families who want more opportunity for their kids.
    • people who want public health care protected.
    • people who want to see politics and our environment cleaned up.

    Monday was a good day for Canadians who want to see real balance in their next Parliament.

    A message from Jack Layton: “Millions of Canadians have placed their trust in this team. They know we’ll be fighting for seniors, for young people, for working families. And we won’t let them down.”

    Jack Layton’s victory speech


    Let's see now, they came in 4th with a whopping 17.5% of the popular vote, and he's giving a victory speech? His party came behind a party that only runs in one province, behind a party that is so crooked people think the surveyors were drunk, and a party that his own supporters call Nazis and dangerous. And he's giving a victory speech? That would be like Rob Babcok giving a victory speech! Hmmm, I wonder what he said...

    We're number 4, we're number 4!

    How come Paul Martin resigns for finishing second and Jack Layton has the audacity for victory speeches? You didn't win Jack, you don't control the national agenda and you shouldn't with a piddly-assed 17.5% of the vote. So thank your supporters then shut up and get on with the business of being irrelevant.

    Sheesh.

    0

    Add a comment

  10. Many of you probably knew that this year celebrates the 250th anniversary of the birth of Mozart. But did you know today was the date on which he was born?

    Mozart is widely considered to be among the top 3 composers in history. Unlike the others, I always felt Mozart would have done fine in modern times as he had a strong element of rocker about him. As it is, he composed in the latter half of the 18th century and crafted some of the finest music ever, including possibly the finest operas.

    If you are wondering what to listen to tonight, throw on some Mozart - classical CD's can usually be had fairly cheap, so go to Walmart and throw down a couple of bucks on a Mozart - try Eine kleine Nachtmusik if you can find it. If you are an Opera fan, or curious about Opera, I recommend Don Giovanni or The Marriage of Figaro: both are hilarious.

    If that doesn't suit you, and you are a Friday night movie watcher, rent 1984's Amadeus again.

    And if none of those are for you, tonight when having a drink, a glass of wine, a beer, raise a toast to Wolfgang Amadeus: I have no doubt that he would like that.


    Update: I like google's daily image.


    0

    Add a comment

Text
Text
"...a policy of freedom for the individual is the only truly progressive policy..." F.A. Hayek
Blog Archive
Contributors
Contributors
Loading